What you are about to read is something the Deep Swamp never wished for anyone to see.
Exposé [Collins Dictionary]
“An exposé is a film or piece of writing which reveals the truth about a situation or person, especially something involving shocking facts.”
Clearly speaking here “Mark Randall” (a pseudonym vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the U.S. government’s National Institute of Health) had decided – because he worked at the center of vaccine production, and made them himself – that it was time to speak out because of the federal governments’ plan to make vaccination mandatory; when in fact he could prove it was much more harmful than helpful.
It is very important that it is made clear that this particular and detailed information has NEVER been made public before. Earlier attempts to release this interview have been subverted – hard copies have been burned and people who were involved in trying to release this information have been threatened.
(We have this at the last minute – and information exposing a wide array of matters is now increasingly flowing.)
Furthermore, this plan was much in line with the NWO’s Agenda 21 or Agenda 30 (population control).
To think that our Government (Congress and Senate) Corporation really does wish to destroy our families by killing ourselves and our children – this should only make us more aware of what it is that we have to do to prevent them from doing so.
The investigative reporter here is [name withheld] and most surely we must send thanks to the gutsy Alan Stang for getting this out to a given few, after most records of this interview were burned or erased in attempts to prevent public exposure.
I hope this gives us all a better perspective on what is going on in that crazy swamp in their attempts to eliminate us.
At the end you will shake your head in disbelief and say to yourself GOTCHA. Yet in fact do we and who is going to move?
And now here is the groundbreaking interview; despite the many efforts to thwart its release.
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine?
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won’t say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believed I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don’t matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was “part of the inner circle.” If now I begin to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall “brilliance” of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It’s one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you
choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: l know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don’t contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation.
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot for example. The MMR. But some lots of vaccines are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I’m concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases that the ones they are supposed to prevent.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases – say Meningitis – that fact is masked because no one believes that the vaccines can do that. The connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Y es. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccines were introduced.
Q: So you’re saying that we have been treated to a false history?
A: Yes. That’s exactly what I’m saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue?
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are he cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into the vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that’s not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I’m talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. The SV40 which was later found in cancer tumors – that was what I would call a structural problem.
It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don’t know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but lets ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?
A: All right. I’ll give you some of what I came across and I’ll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here’s a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccines we found acanthamoeba, which is a so called ‘Train-eating” amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I’ve found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this strait. These are all contaminants which don’t belong in the vaccines?
A: That’s right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don’t really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It’s a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don’t know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles have been made with aborted human fetal tissue.
I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccine from time to time – which may have come from that fetal tissue.
When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that is puzzling. You know it shouldn’t be there, but you don’t know exactly what you’ve got. I have found what I believe was a very small “fragment” of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can be called “foreign protein” which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing ail over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don’t worry, this can’t be helped in making vaccines, you use various animals tissues, and that’s where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I’m not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into Flu vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I’m just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who know how many others there are? Others we don’t find because we don’t think to look for them. If tissues from, say, a bird are used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn’t work that way.
A vaccine is supposed to “create” antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related “killer cells.”
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind, it’s all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important?
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then you’ve concealed the root of the problem.
Q: And what happens ?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the disease they are supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, its circular reasoning.
It’s a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within the companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts.
Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that this was not the case in this instance, I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn’t it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn’t that be the case with vaccines.
If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn’t hat be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations most of the time. Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No, Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation – are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, ‘‘’This vaccine is safe.” But what do they base those judgements on?
They base them, on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, thee are many such instances. And here the evidence is simply ignored. It’s discounted. The experts say, If they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with “guilt by association.” All in all, though, I behaved myself. I made sure I didn’t create problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no “if.” They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn’t. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter.
This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you’ve said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives.
Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotions, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on.
But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system.
I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medial cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them.
At one pointing my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation.
He told me that he was aware of this. He told me that WHO (World Health Organization), is a front for these depopulation interests.
There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on.
They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeovers by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons, which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.
Q: This network you speak of. It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue. And in the industrialized nations?
The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing.
Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines.
However, if the choice issue (the right to take or reject any medicine) does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against bio-warfare germs are going to win out. This is an important time. The furor over the hepatitis vaccine seems one good avenue.
I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine – and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles – is a ridiculous juxtaposition.
Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from “unknown causes,” and that’s why every baby must have the vaccine.
I dispute that 20,000 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital. Yes, Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning.
Perhaps you know that Tony Blair’s wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR.
Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and he made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his “personal and family life.” In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled.
I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.
British reporters should try to get through to her.
They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, Ml6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel. It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
I know that a Hollywood celebrity stated publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.
Hollywood is linked very’ powerfully to the medical cartel. There me several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount off publicity if he says ANYTHING.
In 1992,1 was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in my way against the medical cartel.
Within the National Institute of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money, They don’t need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modem medicine is very successful on every frontier.
To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIT is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits they have conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start.
A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers – a few might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the building as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people, Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview. I’ll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is the one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that.
The burden of proof is not on you and me. And for proof you need well designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow up.
You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things.
The things that are not there.
Q: The things that are not there?
Q: To avoid any confusion, I’d like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine.
He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with.
Or two, he doesn’t get THAT disease, babies are involved, you have parents making the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don’t get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting.
You fight this with better information.
It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it It is every person’s responsibility to make up his mind.
The medical cartel likes that bet It is betting that the fear will win.
Copyright © 2018, GROUP K, Ltd.